| Hudson Institute
- Transforming Charity - Welfare Savings
Chapter 2 - Where the Mission
Meets the Market
By Jay Hein
One of the most impressive welfare
reform programs in the nation is headquartered in Raleigh,
North Carolina. Called the National Jobs Partnership, this
innovative effort provides job training and life skills
development through a 13-week biblically based curriculum
led by pastors and social service staff.
Local employers who have signed up for the program immediately
hire the program's graduates. These businesses also provide
the new employee with an on-the-job mentor, and they reward
mentors financially for their success in coaching.
The Partnership began merely four years ago as a result
of a remarkable conversation between a Raleigh businessman
and an inner city pastor. The two had formed a strong Christian
friendship, which led them to share regular meals and conversation
together. At one lunch, the businessman bemoaned his fate
of having ten trucks parked that day for lack of qualified
workers. The pastor responded that he had dozens of congregants
"parked" at home that day for lack of work.
Soon after their conversation, the two lined up two-dozen
churches and businesses to meet their supply and demand
needs. Now four years later, eighty churches and 100 businesses
are involved in Raleigh. Of the 300 people who started the
program, 80% have graduated and 90% of the graduates are
in full-time jobs. This success rate far exceeds comparable
secular job training programs, and has led to the replication
of the Jobs Partnership in more than thirty cities across
the United States.
What makes this program even more impressive is that it
is run by volunteers, not professionals, and it's paid for
by private resources rather than taxpayer dollars. It is
a break-the-mold model representing the promise of lasting
welfare reform. But how do we create a society that has
more Jobs Partnership offices and fewer bureaucratic welfare
regimes?
One answer is the smart use of welfare savings to build
a new poverty-fighting infrastructure. Since the 1996 welfare
reform act, states have slashed their caseloads by nearly
half, far ahead of schedule. The result is that five-year
block grants issued to the states to pay for reform are
now piling up in their coffers. Government reports estimate
the savings to be at $7 billion today and one study projected
the surplus could reach $22 billion by 2002.
The early evidence is that states are making good decisions
about where they direct the federal surplus. Every state
has increased spending for such essential welfare-to-work
services as child care and transportation, and some have
even taken a cautious path by placing large sums in a "rainy
day" account to use when the economy turns bad.
But so far states have only spent funds on additional programs
and services that have been tried in the past. The welfare
savings represent an opportunity for us to build a new system,
one that includes a much more powerful role for private,
religious organizations while maintaining a limited yet
effective role for government.
Yet it is one thing to agree on this approach, and quite
another to successfully realize its potential. It is very
difficult to navigate the terrain between the bureaucratic,
rule-driven culture of government and the personal, dynamic
nature of community organizations. Also, the best answers
are often held by the members of the nonprofit community
who are unknown because they have spent more time effectively
caring for hurting neighbors than writing proposal for government
funding.
To address these concerns, it is essential for government
to rely on what is known as intermediary organizations.
Quality intermediaries posses an authoritative knowledge
of a local community's finest assets, they speak the language
of both government and the faith community, and they broker
services and relationships between the two sides.
The most acclaimed welfare reform intermediary organization
is the Good Samaritan Ministries in Ottawa County, Michigan.
Ottawa was the first county in the nation to reduce its
welfare caseload to zero, and government officials credit
much of their success to the $99,000 contract they established
with Good Samaritan to mobilize the local church community.
Just as the Biblical "Good Samaritan" cared for
a neighbor in need and referred him to appropriate care
in the community, so too does the modern organization match
needs with care givers. Upon receiving a referral from the
county welfare office, Good Samaritan staff assesses the
family's needs and connects them to a local church.
This may sound easy, but it is worth a look at other efforts
to see just how successful the Ottawa County model is. Compared
with local government efforts in San Diego, which spent
18 months recruiting 18 churches to staff a service center
information desk, Good Samaritan mobilized over 50 churches
in just a few months to perform the more challenging work
of mentoring and counseling.
The formula is straightforward. The challenges of delivering
post-welfare reform services are too big for government
to handle alone. The use of welfare savings to fund a new
public/private infrastructure, relying heavily on the role
of intermediary organizations to bridge the two sectors,
may be the only sustainable resolution to servicng the poor
and strengthening America's communities in the 21st century.
>Return
to Top |